Unique Applicants
38
From 40 raw email submissions[cite: 2]
Assessed by Panel
0 / 38
Candidates with ≥ 1 human review
Panel Shortlisted
0
Human-confirmed shortlist
Reviewer Disagreements
0
Variance ≥ 15 pts or conflicting status
Top Preliminary AI Candidates (For Calibration)
Evaluation Weighting Structure
Showing 38 of 38 applicants
Batch Status Update:
| App ID | Candidate Name | AI Score | Paul Degazon's Score | Consensus | Review Progress | Official Decision | Audit Flag | Action |
|---|
Side-by-Side Candidate Calibration Matrix
Compare up to 4 candidates across competencies, panel ratings, and verified Q&A evidence.
Deliberation Pipeline & Selection Decisions
Human panel decisions require explicit confirmation and recorded rationale.
Evaluation Criteria & Weight Configuration
Administrator settings. Weights must equal exactly 100%.
Full Directory CSV
Complete spreadsheet of all 38 applicants, contact info, questionnaire responses, and review scores.
Selection Decisions Report
Official shortlist, interview candidates, and audit-logged panel rationales.
Reviewer Disagreement Report
Identifies candidates where panel reviewers differed by ≥ 15 points or had conflicting recommendations.
Backup & Restore State (JSON)
Save your entire review state to a JSON file or restore/merge from a panelist backup.